Pierre Garnier: His music label in the crosshairs after complaints of sexism, toxic management, and humiliations

Published on Apr 1, 2026 at 08:42

Pierre Garnier, a recent music revelation at Eurovision, is now facing professional turmoil. An investigation has uncovered allegations against the label Duchess, where several collaborators are reporting an unsettling internal atmosphere. Behind the singer’s rapid rise, testimonies reveal ongoing tensions. Management disputes, challenging working conditions, and financial dysfunctions tarnish the image of a once ambitious structure.

Management denounced within Pierre Garnier’s label

Since the investigation’s publication, several former collaborators have described a particularly demanding work environment. They speak of a Duchess label marked by intense daily pressure. Some mention an intimidating manager, whose actions instilled constant fear. “I never worked serenely,” confesses a former employee, highlighting an environment where everyone sought to avoid conflict. Moreover, the work hours seem incredibly heavy, with days stretching up to thirteen hours. This intensity, combined with a lack of recognition, allegedly created deep discomfort within the teams.

Furthermore, several testimonies point to humiliating or inappropriate behavior. Some accuse the management of using devaluing remarks to maintain authority. “He likes to belittle to keep power,” explains a producer. Others mention sexist comments or inappropriate messages exchanged internally, contradicting official statements. In response to these accusations, founder Léo Chatelier acknowledges mistakes in his management, while denying any malicious intent. He claims to have learned on the job and asserts that measures have been implemented since, including an internal charter and reorganization for more balance.

Financial dysfunctions and professional disillusionment

Simultaneously, several former employees denounce recurrent financial issues. Testimonies report frequent payment delays, and even salaries being paid in installments. “I was paid in three parts,” recounts a former collaborator, illustrating perceived unstable practices. Some even claim to still be owed money from years ago. For others, the issue goes beyond finances. “It’s not the amount, but the principle,” insists a former employee, citing a lasting loss of trust. These situations have reportedly weakened professional relationships and fueled a sense of injustice within the teams. Additionally, some testimonies mention requests to modify invoices to meet budget constraints. Although these practices are disputed, they contribute to doubts surrounding the label’s management. The founder explains that he started the company without significant resources and admits to early mistakes. However, he emphasizes that the accounts are now monitored and compliant. Despite these assurances, several former collaborators hold bitter memories of their experience. One of them concludes, “I came out with a bad taste in the mouth of the music industry,” summarizing profound disillusionment after total commitment.

Watch the video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np-HZjal5sE