If you keep up with the news, it can feel like a whirlwind of events that never stops. Policies are announced, controversies take over headlines, and before you know it, another news story takes its place. This constant cycle can create a sense of anxiety, not necessarily about what is actually happening, but about what we can see.
This is partly due to the way political news is currently delivered. The approach is often described as “flooding the zone,” where a continuous stream of announcements, executive actions, and controversies keeps the focus moving so quickly that no single issue gets fully understood. The attention remains on what is new, rather than what comes next.
However, what happens next is crucial, as it often changes the narrative and reveals a more complex picture than initially presented.
Since taking office again, Donald Trump has issued numerous executive orders, many of which have faced immediate challenges in court. Judges have consistently blocked or limited these policies, including recent rulings against executive orders targeting law firms and requiring revisions to Pentagon media restrictions.
While these outcomes may not always make front-page news, they demonstrate an important point – resistance is ongoing and happening continuously. This crucial aspect is often overlooked.
When the only information people receive is the most sensational and alarming moments, it can give the impression that everything is final and uncontested. In reality, many of these policies are being slowed down, reshaped, or altogether stopped through legal and institutional challenges that unfold over time.
This doesn’t mean everything is smooth sailing, but it does show that everything is still up for debate.
This pattern is not unique to federal politics. Issues like temporary ceasefires in Gaza or changes to state-level voting laws, housing policies, and environmental regulations continue to impact people’s lives without dominating national conversations.
These developments may not solve everything, but they are signs that outcomes are still fluid and subject to change. This distinction is important because viewing everything as worsening is not only discouraging but also inaccurate. What appears to be a decline is actually a process of contention.
For students, this should influence how we interact with political news. Instead of trying to keep up with every headline, focus on what endures – whether policies are upheld, challenged, and what follows after the initial announcement.
It also means being strategic about how we consume news. Relying solely on headlines or social media reactions can lead to feeling overwhelmed and missing instances of resistance.
If the current narrative thrives on fear and negativity by making people feel powerless, staying engaged is a way to push back – not by knowing everything, but by refusing to accept that everything is already set in stone.
Outcomes are still in flux, meaning the future is not predetermined, and we hold more influence than we may think.
:fill(black)/2026/03/20/capture-d-ecran-2026-03-20-104720-69bd18fb02c4d082703432.jpg "One wildcard after maternity? A new breakthrough in surfing that will benefit Johann Defay")
